Home   |   About Bucks   |   Site Map     Twitter Facebook

2018 News

Bucks County Sues Pharma Firms, Distributors for Opioid Crisis Damages

May 29, 2018

Bucks County today filed suit against major manufacturers and distributors of prescription opioids in an effort to stanch the flood of addictive medications into the community and to recover damages for the devastating losses – human and financial – caused by the opioid epidemic.

Commissioner Loughery Opens the Press Conference Detailing the Litigation Against Opioid Manufacturers and DistributorsA sweeping, 159-page civil complaint, filed today in the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, seeks an undetermined amount of compensatory and punitive damages from 17 corporate defendants and one individual alleged to be responsible for the deadly and costly wave of opioid addiction currently afflicting the county.

“While you can’t put a price or a value on human life … we the County do think we can put a price on the collateral costs of dealing with this epidemic right here in Bucks County,” Commissioners Chairman Robert G. Loughery said at an afternoon news conference announcing the lawsuit. “We want to take a stand against this epidemic, and this scourge on our families.”

Among the defendants are 14 corporate entities that include the largest producers of prescription opioids – led by Purdue Pharma, creator of OxyContin, a drug which has claimed roughly 30 percent of the market for analgesic painkillers and annual national sales of up to $3.1 billion.

Also named as defendants are three corporate distributors that claim up to 85 percent of the market share for prescription opioid distribution in the United States.

Commissioner Martin discusses the reasons for the Civil Complaint filed in the Courts.The sole individual defendant is John Kapoor, founder and former CEO of Insys Therapeutics, Inc., manufacturer of Subsys, a fentanyl-based spray medication. Kapoor is among six Insys corporate officials charged in a federal racketeering indictment in Boston for allegedly paying kickback to doctors for prescribing Subsys.

“Just as nearly every citizen has been touched by the opioid epidemic, virtually every county office has been harmed and damaged,” said attorney Joshua D. Snyder of the law firm Bo

ni, Zack & Snyder of Bala Cynwyd, which is acting as local counsel in the lawsuit. “We intend to seek justice for Bucks County, and prosecute this case vigorously through trial if necessary.”

Snyder’s firm is working with by Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law, a national firm representing government entities in similar litigation in several states. Loughery said the attorneys are working on a contingency basis, meaning the county is not charged up-front for their services, but that the lawyers will be paid a percentage of any damages awarded to the county.The lawsuit alleges that the manufacturer defendants misled the public about the dangers of prescription opioids, and that the defendants responsible for distributing opioids into the community disregarded their obligation to monitor distribution and halt any “suspicious sales” to protect the community from an exorbitant flood of opioids.

District Attorney Matt Weintraub speaks on the reasons he, as well as many other District Attorneys and Attorney Generals are for the litigation.“A pharmaceutical manufacturer should never place its desire for profits above the health and well-being of its customers,” the complaint states. “…A pharmaceutical manufacturer has a legal duty to tell the truth when marketing its drugs and to ensure that its marketing claims are supported by science and medical evidence. A pharmaceutical distributor of controlled substances has a legal duty to conduct its business lawfully and carefully and in a manner that does not irresponsibly and unreasonably saturate a community with opioids. An executive of a pharmaceutical company, such as the Individual Defendant, has a legal obligation to ensure that his company conducts itself in a manner compliant with the law that is designed to protect rather than harm patients.

“Defendants broke these simple rules,” the complaint states.

Bucks County has been hard hit by the resulting opioid epidemic. It is now estimated that 80 percent of street-level heroin users in the United States began their addictions through the use of prescription pain medication. The fallout here has been staggering.

Fueled by the opioid epidemic, the complaint alleges, overdose fatalities in Bucks County reached 232 last year, an 89 percent increase over 2015. The collateral costs of dealing with such widespread addiction have left the county strapped on many fronts.

This array of financial hardships includes, but is not limited to:

  • A $20 million prison expansion to accommodate the exploding inmate population, much of it addiction-related
  •  $4 million in annual outsourcing costs to house Bucks County inmates in other prisons because of addiction-fueled overcrowding
  • Hiring two additional Coroner’s Office employees to handle the influx of opioid-related deaths, and paying for burial of a significant number of unclaimed corpses of overdose victims
  • Creation of a six-detective, $900,000-per-year Drug Strike Force by the District Attorney’s Office to help fight the opioid crisis
  • A 66.5 percent increase in opioid-related 911 emergency calls since 2012, with each call taking about 30 minutes to resolve, at a cost of about $30 per hour
  • Rising county insurance payments resulting from unwarranted and potentially dangerous chronic opioid therapy for employees, retirees and dependents – and frequent ensuing payments for addiction-related treatment
  • NARCAN purchases and training
  • Increased expenses and strain on police, fire and EMS personnel
  • Public health training, and recovery programs and campaigns
  • Rehabilitation clinics, addiction treatment centers and suicide prevention services
  • Services for infants born with addictions and young children traumatized by addiction in their homes
  • Diversion of the Fire Marshal to inspect foster-care homes of children removed from drug-infested households
  • Diversion of public works employees and the Fire Marshal to bring “sober houses” up to code and safe for addicted residents
  • Lost productivity of county workers afflicted with addiction-related issues or who are dealing with loved ones with addictions
  • Increased law enforcement and court costs including overtime, anti-gang activity, toxicology tests and other drug- and addiction-fueled costs
  • Skyrocketing costs of child abuse investigations. The county spent almost $11.5 million on such investigations, many of them addiction-related, an increase of 440 percent since 2004
  • “Virtually every department within Bucks County (including the Health Department, Social Services and Economic Development) has been impacted, and forced to incur additional expenses year after year to try to mitigate the devastating impact of the opioid epidemic to Bucks County residents,” the complaint states. “…Through their promotion, marketing and distribution of opioids for profit, all Defendants created a public nuisance in Bucks County.”

Joseph McFadden, Lower Southampton Township Supervisor and President of Bucks County Association of Township Officials reads a resolution from BCATO in support of the litigation and the county.Speaking at the news conference, County Commissioner Charles W. Martin said opioid addiction “not only impacts county government to a great degree, but it impacts local government – police, fire, EMS… I think we have done the right thing” in taking legal action.

District Attorney Matthew D. Weintraub said his office’s prosecutions “are dominated by drug-fueled crimes. We started a six-man Drug Strike Force, thanks to the commissioners, solely to combat this epidemic….This lawsuit, frankly, is about accountability.”

Also expressing support for the civil action was Lower Southampton Township Supervisor Joseph McFadden, president of the Bucks County Association of Township Officials, alongside fellow association officers Daniel McPhillips of Warminster Township and Maggie Rash of Buckingham Township.

“This is hitting our township municipalities right in the wallet,” McFadden said. “It’s hitting our residents, it’s killing our residents. We need to make it stop, and that’s the reason we, as municipalities, stand firm in support of the county’s actions today.”

Loughery noted that Bucks joins many communities in this region and across the nation that have filed such legal actions against the opioid industry.

“I believe the more that this pressure grows, that we will be victorious at some point,” he said. “How long that’s going to take, I can’t tell you. But doing nothing isn’t really an option for us.”

Resolution of Bucks County Association of Township Officials Supporting Opioid Litigation

Audio of Opioid Litigation Press Conference

Video of Opioid Litigation Press Conference

Bucks County Civil Complaint Document